TU Clausthal Stud.IP
Lecture: Einführung in die Verhaltensökonomik - Details
You are not logged into Stud.IP.

General information

Course number S 6770
Semester SS 2022
Current number of participants 8
Home institute Institut für Wirtschaftswissenschaft
Courses type Lecture in category Teaching
First date Tue., 19.04.2022 15:00 - 17:00, Room: (B2-003 Peter Dietz Hörsaal)
Performance record Theoretische Arbeit
Literatur DellaVigna, S. (2009). Psychology and economics: Evidence from the field. Journal of Economic Literature, 47(2), 315-72.

Camerer, C. F., Loewenstein, G., & Rabin, M. (Eds.). (2011). Advances in behavioral economics. Princeton University Press.

Camerer, C. F. (2011). Behavioral game theory: Experiments in strategic interaction. Princeton University Press.

Wilkinson, N., & Klaes, M. (2017). An introduction to behavioral economics.. Macmillan International Higher Education.

Angner, E. (2016). A Course in Behavioral Economics 2e. Palgrave Macmillan.

Beck, H. (2014). Behavioral Economics. Springer Gabler, Wiesbaden.

Vertiefende Literatur:

Green, L., Fristoe, N., & Myerson, J. (1994). Temporal discounting and preference reversals in choice between delayed outcomes. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 1(3), 383-389.

Rubinstein, A. (2003). ”Economics and psychology”? The case of hyperbolic discounting. International Economic Review, 44(4), 1207-1216.

Kahneman, D., & Tversky, A. (1979). Prospect Theory: An Analysis of Decision under Risk. Econometrica, 47(2), 263-292.

Daruvala, D. (2010). Would the right social preference model please stand up!. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 73(2), 199-208.

Charness, G., & Rabin, M. (2002). Understanding social preferences with simple tests. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 117(3), 817-869.

Svenson, O. (1981). Are we all less risky and more skillful than our fellow drivers?. Acta Psychologica, 47(2), 143-148.

Blavatskyy, P. R. (2009). Betting on own knowledge: Experimental test of overconfidence. Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, 38(1), 39-49.

Moore, D. A., & Healy, P. J. (2008). The trouble with overconfidence. Psychological Review, 115(2), 502.

Svenson, O. (1981). Are we all less risky and more skillful than our fellow drivers?. Acta Psychologica, 47(2), 143-148.

Blavatskyy, P. R. (2009). Betting on own knowledge: Experimental test of overconfidence. Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, 38(1), 39-49.

Moore, D. A., & Healy, P. J. (2008). The trouble with overconfidence. Psychological Review, 115(2), 502.

Tversky, A., & Kahneman, D. (1974). Judgment under uncertainty: Heuristics and biases. Science, 185(4157), 1124-1131.

Simon, H. A. (1955). A behavioral model of rational choice. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 69(1), 99-118.

Nagel, R. (1995). Unraveling in guessing games: An experimental study. The American Economic Review, 85(5), 1313-1326.

Gigerenzer, G., & Gaissmaier, W. (2011). Heuristic decision making. Annual Review of Psychology, 62, 451-482.

Kahneman, D., Knetsch, J. L., & Thaler, R. H. (1990). Experimental tests of the endowment effect and the Coase theorem. Journal of Political Economy, 98(6), 1325-1348.

Norton, M. I., Mochon, D., & Ariely, D. (2012). The IKEA effect: When labor leads to love. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 22(3), 453-460.

Pope, D. G., & Schweitzer, M. E. (2011). Is Tiger Woods loss averse? Persistent bias in the face of experience, competition, and high stakes. American Economic Review, 101(1), 129-57.

Bar-Eli, M., Avugos, S., & Raab, M. (2006): Twenty years of ”hot hand” research: Review and critique. Psychology of Sport and Exercise, 7(6), 525-553.

Kolev, G. I., Pina, G., & Todeschini, F. (2015). Decision making and underperformance in competitive environments: Evidence from the national hockey league. Kyklos, 68(1), 65-80.
Medienformen Präsentation, Skript, E-Learning-Materialien, Klassenzimmerexperimente, Online-Experimente
SWS 2

Course location / Course dates

(B2-003 Peter Dietz Hörsaal) Tuesday: 15:00 - 17:00, weekly (14x)

Comment/Description

* Präferenzen
1.1 Zeitpräferenzen
1.2 Risikopräferenzen
1.3 Soziale Präferenzen
1.4 Soziale Identitäten
1.5 Fairness-Präferenzen 
* Erwartungen (Beliefs)
2.1 Overconfidence
2.2 Self-serving bias
2.3 Ankereffekte und Gambler’s fallacy
* Entscheidungen
3.1 Begrenzte Rationalität und Entscheidungsheuristiken
3.2 Endowment, Trophy und IKEA Effect
* Anwendungen
4.1 Umweltökonomik
4.2 Political Economy